I read this article on Adorno's "There can be no poetry after the Holocaust" quote after seeing a tweet (https://nitter.net/allarobarnobest/status/2059130250844307630) about it this morning. Obviously there's the Jewish narcissism and self-importance angle, but there are still historically unprecedented aspects of the Holocaust which may strike such horror in one as to think of it as a great turning point - or lifting of the veil - in mankind (one being a faggot, of course). You know, with the 20th century anti-fascist conception of Nazism as a populist mass hysteria and descent into frenzied barbarism (only Jacob Geller still tries to Serve This Coke The Old-Fashioned Way because he's a fucking shtel rat constantly living in fear of annuda pogrom, and his moralism about violence quickly falls flat once he starts talking about Wolfenstein), and the Holocaust being an "industrialisation" of violence never seen before, both in its scale and efficiency, its formalisation as a process, and in how the accountability and guilt for each individual murder is spread over an untold number of people - some perhaps not even being aware of their involvement in the process until its too late to object. "Banality of evil" being a snide kike vulgarisation and shallowing of such. The Holocaust as the industrial, inhuman manufacturing of Death; "Nazism as some kind of horrifying victory of death rather than a wrong idea about the world". It's a far more coherent application of the phrase 'industrial' than the way faggot imbeciles talk about the "grooming gangs", their language obviously being downstream of this usage of it.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41556053
Anyway yeah the article, most of what I said isn't in there, this was just me applying a little 'theory of mind', that ghastly, idiotic, senseless phrase, on Adorno's position while reading through it. Wish I still remembered what Reynolds said about Adorno and that quote in particular in his X spaces, besides the context around him and his writing.